Skills Validation - Moving from Learning to Performance

, Be the first to comment

Tags: Human Factors Skills Validation Training


Training alone may not necessarily improve team performance. Skills Validation is an effective tool for realizing the benefits of training. What are the benefits of Skills Validation and how do you implement it?

Skills Validation

When a knowledge gap (I don't know something) or skills gap (I don't know how to do something) is identified, our "go to" solution is usually training. Send the team to class and they will improve!

When confronted with a performance problem, we may be tempted to throw training dollars at it in the hopes that it will go away. But training, in and of itself, is not always the solution. There are times when training may not be the solution to performance problems. Several examples are when members of the team lack motivation (don't want to do something), when they lack resources (don't have what they need to do something), or when training has not been effective (they still don't know how to do it).

So, if training is not the solution, then what is? Actually, training is an important part of the solution when your team has knowledge or skills gaps. But it is not the entire solution. Training (classes, online, on-the-job training (OJT), etc.) can help team members learn concepts and acquire new skills. However, just because your team has been trained doesn't necessarily translate to improved performance. How can you be sure that the new knowledge and skills are being applied on the job? How can you be sure that training results in improved performance?

Enter Skills Validation

Skills Validation is the process of verifying that team members are, in fact, able to put their training into practice. It is essentially saying to your team: "We have provided training to you, now show us that you know what you are talking about and know what you are doing."

Knowledge and skills validation is a process that usually follows training and involves assessing an individual's knowledge and ability to perform job tasks. Individuals that successfully complete this process are considered "qualified" or "competent".

The basic steps of a knowledge and skills validation process consist of:

  1. Define your processes - If you don't have a defined process (procedure, flowchart, work instruction, etc.), how can you determine if an individual is performing a task correctly?
  2. Select the right individual(s) - Does this person have the background, experience, and potential to be successful doing this?
  3. Develop knowledge and skills - Provide training, opportunities for practice, OJT. This may include obtaining industry certifications.
  4. Validate knowledge and skills - An assessor (someone already qualified on the task and trained/qualified to evaluate others) asks questions (to confirm knowledge) and observes the individual performing the task (to observe performance). Success and/or any gaps observed are documented. If the individual is successful, they are considered qualified on the task. If knowledge and/or skills gaps are identified, the individual can re-train or practice to close the performance gaps.

Organizations that perform skills validation in conjunction with training realize benefits in terms of performance, quality, consistency, and confidence. Skills validation confirms whether knowledge and skills are being properly applied on the job and provides individual feedback to close performance gaps. The practice forces you to define how tasks should be accomplished and measures individual performance against those common standards. Individuals qualified through this process have shown their leadership that they know what they are doing, boosting the team's confidence in itself. Leadership has confirmed that their team members know what they are doing, boosting leadership's confidence in the team.

In the context of Risk-based Inspection (RBI), AOC has been working with companies since 2014 to apply this process to evaluate and improve the performance of risk assessment personnel. If we can help you too, please contact us.


Be the first to comment

Comments

There are no comments for this article.

Add your comment

Related Services

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Implementation and Planning

AOC has delivered thousands of sustainable Risk Based Inspection (RBI) programs earning the trust of owner operators.

Development of Mechanical Integrity (MI) Procedures and Processes

A maintenance system designed in which elements work together as a quality system for maximum returns

Related Training

Ensuring People Performance

How do I transfer knowledge to my team and verify their skills?

So You Want To Be an RBI Risk Analyst

What does a Risk Analyst do and how do I become one?

The Learning Management Approach

Are your inspectors empowered to sustain your RBI program after the service provider completes their fixed price contract?

Requirements for Becoming a Risk Analyst

What do I need to do to be a Risk Analyst?

Learning Management

Achieve an RBI program complete with KPIs, Best Practices, and Skills Validation

Related Knowledge

Safe Operation of Aging Hydrogen Generation Plants

Integrating DMR, RBI, and IOWs to manage aging plant reliability

The MI Assessment - Understanding Your Mechanical Integrity Goals

Compliance? | Best Practice? | Risk Reduction? | One Step at a Time? | Capture Personnel Knowledge? | All Of The Above?

Risk Based Inspection: What To Expect

Significant findings, even after ten years.

Meaningful KPIs

Anything worth doing is worth doing right.

Implementing RBI in Remote Locations

The importance of understanding risk and the significant value attainable through the implementation of risk based inspection (RBI)

An Update on Risk Based Inspection (RBI) (RMC-12-46)

Using RISK as a basis for maintenance planning

Risk Based Asset Management - Delivering and Sustaining Value

The business case developed for an RBI program - realized benefits and how the on-going value of the program is measured

Global Challenges Facing HSE Within the Oil and Gas Industry

Challenges of migrating North American and European HS&E management systems and personnel into domains that have not placed HS&E as a core element of success