Storage Tank RBI

The process industry is faced with increasing economic pressure and a no-tolerance attitude toward environmental accidents. The presence of a large number of storage tanks containing dangerous products constitutes one of the major risks of pollution. Storage tanks are continuously subjected to environmental effects, unavoidably leading to degradation under the form of a corrosion attack. This degradation causes a gradual loss of material and accumulates over the years, ultimately resulting in complete wall penetration and leak formation. Through a leak, the contained product will pollute soil and groundwater. RBI is well established and widely used in the oil and gas, refining, petrochemical and chemical industries. Internal examination of storage tanks, especially of the floor, is difficult and costly. Prioritizing inspections and repair based on risk can improve reliability by focusing inspection resources on those damage mechanisms driving the tank's risk.

Storage Tank RBI

A criticality assessment was conducted on a Storage Tank Farm in Seabrook Texas. The project involved an RBI assessment of 14 pressure vessels, 2 heat exchangers, 108 storage tanks, 888 piping circuits and 187 relief devices. A total of 17 items were found to have a "High" rating. The distribution of overall criticality ratings for the items in scope is summarized as follows.

DISTRIBUTION OF CRITICALITY RANKINGS
Overall Criticality Category
Equipment Type Equipment Count Component Count High M-H Medium Low
Piping Circuits888888011794677
Fixed Equipment Components124340156354208
Relief Devices1871872429647
Totals1,1991,41517222244932

Seventeen items were in the "High" Criticality category due to a combination of internal and external corrosion. The relief devices are High because of the deterioration potential based in part on last inspection date

Risk Distribution by Damage Mechanism

The following shows the Criticality Matrix for this facility with the number of equipment item components in each block. These represent all of the equipment types included in the study. The Probability of Failure Rankings are on the vertical axis and range from "1" (Very High Probability) to "5" (Very Low Probability). The Consequence of Failure Rankings are on the horizontal axis and range from "A" (Catastrophic) to "E" (Minor).

Combined Risk Distribution
I.C Risk Distribution
E.C Risk Distribution
Environmental Cracking Distribution
Other Damage Mechanism Distribution

Probability of Failure

The following figure separates the probability of failure count by internal corrosion and external corrosion, stress corrosion cracking and other mechanisms. Internal and external corrosion and SCC are the major factors contributing to the higher probabilities.

Probability of Failure by Damage Mechanism

Probability of Failure by Damage Mechanism

Probability Analysis for Pressure Relief Valves

The Criticality Rating considers both the probability and consequence of failure categories. The probability of failure is based on the failure mode "failure to relieve at design pressure", which covers the most important failure scenario. The probability category is established by considering the potential for internal corrosion, fouling and plugging. Credit is given when a rupture disk protects a relief valve. Interviews with operations personnel and reviews of the shop test reports are used to determine the deterioration potential. The potential and the time interval since the last shop overhaul are used to determine a deterioration factor, which is converted directly into a probability of failure category. This study revealed that many of the pressure relief devices were in "like new" (4) condition.

The Probability of Failure Rankings are based on valve history, length of time in service, and the potential for fouling or plugging.

The Consequence Rankings are based on the highest consequence of failure of the protected equipment items.

Relief Device Risk Distribution

Consequence of Failure

Unit Rank Equipment ID Component Reason for HIGH
Bay 19131-19-050-T-050-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 19231-19-050-T-050-01RoofExternal Corrosion
Bay 19331-19-052-T-052-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 19431-19-052-T-052-01RoofExternal Corrosion
Bay 17531-17-098-T-098-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 04631-04-031-T-031-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 04731-04-030-T-030-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 17831-17-096-T-096-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion

For all components in the study, the consequence analysis was modeled as a release of a fluid from the pressure-containing boundary to the atmosphere. The consequence analysis utilized models that consider flammable, toxic, inert and reactive consequences. The Consequence Ranking Distribution for all components is shown graphically in the following Figure.

Consequence of Failure Distribution

Inspection Work Plan Summary

Inspection plans were generated for all equipment items in the study. Each plan included the Equipment ID, Inspection Priority Ranking, all potential damage mechanisms associated with each item and the suggested inspection method to address each damage mechanism. The following represents the proposed inspection work plan for the highest risk items found in the study. The next step in managing the RBI program in this unit is to follow through the recommended inspections. Then for items found to be in the Higher Criticality Categories, establish a plan for managing them. Some of the items can be addressed very quickly; others have to wait until the next shutdown. The table below lists the HIGH Criticality items, the mechanism responsible for the HIGH Risk and a general inspection recommendation.

Unit Rank Equipment ID Component Reason for HIGH
Bay 19131-19-050-T-050-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 19231-19-050-T-050-01RoofExternal Corrosion
Bay 19331-19-052-T-052-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 19431-19-052-T-052-01RoofExternal Corrosion
Bay 17531-17-098-T-098-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 04631-04-031-T-031-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 04731-04-030-T-030-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion
Bay 17831-17-096-T-096-01Storage Tank ShellExternal Corrosion

Risk Reduction

The following shows the projected risk reduction in dollars per year as a result of focusing inspections on the higher criticality items. For this analysis, it was assumed that the risk reduction would result from addressing the highest 8 (1%) of the fixed equipment items in the study, resulting in a 90% risk reduction of nearly $2,500,000 per year.

Risk Reduction

Conclusion

The above provides insight into the results of an RBI study across a number of fixed equipment asset families, relief devices and piping circuits. In addition to the significant risk reduction delivered ($2.5M annually) from an RBI program, cost savings can be realized by a factor of 50% for vessel inspections and up to 75% for piping inspections. Typical turnarounds can be optimized and internal inspections of less critical assets extended allowing refiners to realize millions in USD in T/A savings.

Case Study Inquiry

Related Services

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Implementation and Planning

AOC has delivered thousands of sustainable Risk Based Inspection (RBI) programs earning the trust of owner operators.

Damage Mechanism Review / Corrosion Study

One of the most important steps in an RBI project is the corrosion study or damage mechanism review.

End-of-Life, Remaining-Life, and Fitness-for-Service Assessments

When evaluation of inspection results suggest that an asset is near its end of useful life, Fitness for Service evaluations can determine if the asset us suitable for continued operation.

Corrosion Control Planning

Achieving zero corrosion-related loss of primary containment in the refining industry.

Reliability Based Asset Management - AIM for all asset families

Asset Integrity Management for all asset families - Rotating, Electrical, Instrumentation, and Fixed Assets

Related Training

API 580 Training

Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice?

API 580 RBI Training (Online)

Need to study API Recommended Practice 580 on your own?

API 580 RBI Overview

What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?

RBI/MI Overview

What is Risk Based Inspection?

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) - A Mechanical Integrity Best Practice

What are your goals for RBI? How will you measure your success? How will you sustain that success?

Reliability Revolution - Measuring the Value of an RBI Program

How does one of the largest chemical manufacturers measure the value of their RBI program?

Value Proposition

Developing the value proposition and business case for an RBI program

Related Knowledge

RBMI Implementation Saves Refinery $63 Million

130,000 BPD Refinery Implements RBMI Program and projects a $63 Million savings over 10 years.

Corrosion Under Insulation (CUI) in Plant Equipment and Piping

Implementation of a managed CUI program yields prioritized inspection plans and identifies imminent failures.

Safe Operation of Aging Hydrogen Generation Plants

Integrating DMR, RBI, and IOWs to manage aging plant reliability

Risk Based Inspection: What To Expect

Significant findings, even after ten years.

Time to Value - Asset Integrity Management

Delivering knowledge based asset files from the true sources of data - confidently, accurately, electronically, and in half the time.

Implementing RBI in Remote Locations

The importance of understanding risk and the significant value attainable through the implementation of risk based inspection (RBI)

An Update on Risk Based Inspection (RBI) (RMC-12-46)

Using RISK as a basis for maintenance planning

Risk Based Asset Management - Delivering and Sustaining Value

The business case developed for an RBI program - realized benefits and how the on-going value of the program is measured