From Fitness for Service to a Reliability-Based Mechanical Integrity Program - A Journey from the Ashes to Sustained Reliability (RMC-10-30)


The fitness for service/salvage study was completed on the fractionator on January 28, 2005. As a result of the study, the Alberta Boiler Standards Administration (ABSA) allowed the repaired fractionator and upgrader to be brought back to full production a year earlier than expected. Following the study we began implementing a risk based inspection program based on the API 580 certified reliability based mechanical integrity (RBMI) technology and work processes.

- Reliability and Maintenance Conference,

From Fitness for Services to a Reliability Based MI Program

RMC-10-30 From Fitness for Service to a Reliability- Based Mechanical Integrity Program - A Journey from the Ashes to Sustained Reliability

Abstract

From fitness for service to a reliability based mechanical integrity program - a journey from the ashes to sustained reliability.

On Friday, February 04, 2005, Suncor Energy announced that a ruptured recycle line was most likely the cause of a January 4 fire that damaged one of the company's two oil sands upgraders.

Suncor's preliminary findings suggest a recycle line that filters heavy oil from the fractionator before rerouting it back through the tower ruptured and released hydrocarbon vapor, which ignited. The fractionator is a processing unit that separates crude oil products. The ruptured recycle line was not lined with stainless steel, which is used to prevent corrosion. It is likely that corrosion caused the line to rupture. Source:

RIGZONE NEWS provided by Rigzone.com - Source: Suncor Energy

Following the fire that damaged the main fractionator, Suncor conducted a fire damage assessment that would enable the upgrader to be brought back on line as early as safely possible. The fire damage assessment was performed based on API RP 579: Fitness-For-Service. The result of the study enabled the upgrader to be brought safely back into production a year ahead of expectations avoiding an opportunity cost exceeding $300 million. This paper describes that study along with Suncor's subsequent implementation of a risk based inspection program to mitigate the possible occurrence of a similar, future catastrophic event.

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Fire Damage Assessment
  • Remaining Life Assessment
  • Integrity of the cladding inside the fractionator
  • Defining Heat Exposure Zones
  • Insulation Jacketing
  • Concluding statement and actual state of the fractionator
  • Cause of Damage
  • Extent of the Damage
  • Description of the Defect
  • Further Inspection Required
  • Basis for the Final Assessment
  • Next steps to achieve and ensure mechanical integrity

The paper was presented in San Antonio at the NPRA Reliability Conference on May 25-28, 2010.

Publication Inquiry

Related Services

Mechanical Integrity Assessments

An interdependent assessment of your people, process, and technologies for a confident path forward

Development of Mechanical Integrity (MI) Procedures and Processes

A maintenance system designed in which elements work together as a quality system for maximum returns

RAM, RCM, FMEA, FMECA and Bad Actor Analysis

AOC delivers the policies, procedures, work processes, knowledge and actions such as preventive maintenance, predictive maintenance, and condition monitoring tasks.

Related Tools

RBI Potential Savings Calculator

Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.

Mechanical Integrity (MI) Compliance Checklist

Is your plant's MI program compliant? Use our checklist to assess your current program against industry standards and receive expert recommendations for improvement.

Related Training

RBI/MI Overview

A high level overview introducing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) - A Mechanical Integrity Best Practice

What are your goals for RBI? How will you measure your success? How will you sustain that success?

GE APM Mechanical Integrity Work Process Training

How do I use GE APM to perform MI/RBI tasks?

RBI Concepts - Return on Net Assets (RONA)

Asset Integrity Management - how you perform at the plant level affects those goals set at the board room

Related Knowledge

How to practically implement RBI for oil and gas production.

Practical guide for implementing a Mechanical Integrity and RBI program for U.S. oil and gas wellfield, gathering, and midstream facilities. Aligns lifecycle asset management, inspection, and risk control with API standards, PHMSA pipeline rules, and OSHA PSM requirements.

What Good Refining Corporate Cultures Look Like

What does a strong refining culture actually look like in practice? Explore seven key attributes, from technical authority to management presence, that transform culture into a powerful risk-control system.

Plant Management 101: Common Work Processes

A dysfunctionality found in many refineries, chemical plants, and other production facilities, is a lack of common asset management work processes.

Can you improve reliability focusing on 3 priorities?

Safety-first organizations consistently outperform on reliability when priorities are truly enforced, not just stated.

Is Your RBI 3rd Party Qualified?

Don’t let your RBI program become a "paperwork exercise." Learn how to distinguish between a qualified technical partner and a software-only contractor to ensure true operational safety.

Why We're Lowering Our Rates - and Why Now?

Rate reduction on new projects to support the industry during the current extended downturn.

Asset Value Management vs Asset Performance Management

A look at how the financial sector's concept of Asset Value Management can be applied to the petrochemical industry.

RBI Value: Both Transitioning And From The Start

A look at how RBI adds value whether you are just starting out or transitioning from a traditional methodology.

PHMSA vs OSHA Jurisdiction

PHMSA has out for comment, draft document information, that clarifies its jurisdiction in relation to OSHA for Midstream Processing Facilities.

How can I judge equivalent inspection techniques?

Organizations that follow the spirit of risk-based inspection rather than its minimum requirements use a definable, structured, auditable process to confirm that an alternate inspection technique provides equal or better risk reduction than a baseline method.