Possible PHMSA and OSHA Jurisdictional Clarity

, Be the first to comment

Tags: Mechanical Integrity Process Safety Management Regulation


PHMSA has out for comment, draft document information, that clarifies its jurisdiction in relation to OSHA for Midstream Processing Facilities.

Possible PHMSA and OSHA Jurisdictional Clarity

On November 4, 2020, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) issued draft guidance on jurisdictional overlap with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) on "Midstream Processing Facilities". The draft notification document was issued to help clear up where PHMSA's jurisdiction ends and OHSA's begins. Up until this announcement, the term "Midstream Processing Facility" has not been defined in any Pipeline Safety Laws or the PHMSA and/or OSHA regulations.

The principal question for companies in these sectors to ponder was whether these facilities fell under the OHSA, Process Safety Management regulation. Without the above definition the confusion has been mainly predicated on in the CFR 1910.119, "Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals", applicability requirement:

"1910.119(a)
Application.
1910.119(a)(1)
This section applies to the following:
1910.119(a)(1)(i)
A process which involves a chemical at or above the specified threshold quantities listed in appendix A to this section;
1910.119(a)(1)(ii)
A process which involves a Category 1 flammable gas (as defined in 1910.1200(c)) or a flammable liquid with a flashpoint below 100 °F (37.8 °C) on site in one location, in a quantity of 10,000 pounds (4535.9 kg) or more except for:
1910.119(a)(1)(ii)(A)
Hydrocarbon fuels used solely for workplace consumption as a fuel (e.g., propane used for comfort heating, gasoline for vehicle refueling), if such fuels are not a part of a process containing another highly hazardous chemical covered by this standard;
1910.119(a)(1)(ii)(B)
Flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 °F (37.8 °C) stored in atmospheric tanks or transferred which are kept below their normal boiling point without benefit of chilling or refrigeration.
1910.119(a)(2)
This section does not apply to:
1910.119(a)(2)(i)
Retail facilities;
1910.119(a)(2)(ii)
Oil or gas well drilling or servicing operations; or,
1910.119(a)(2)(ii)
Normally unoccupied remote facilities."

The case about applicability mainly boils down to the interpretation of three subclauses above:

  • 1910.119(a)(1)(ii)
  • 1910.119(a)(2)(ii)
  • 1910.119(a)(2)(ii)

A company's interpretation of these subclauses and the OSHA and PHMSA regulations requires them to pick which regulation to follow. From the operator's point of view, this creates a possible regulatory liability based on the company's choice or requires the company to try to satisfy both regulations creating confusion and extra cost.

As an acknowledgement of the problem, the year 2014 saw the formation of a "Working Group" whose purpose for "Midstream Processing Facilities" was to:

  • To evaluate equivalency between the PHMSA and OSHA safety requirements.
  • Identify how to delineate jurisdictional boundaries and oversight.
  • Address the oversight of midstream processing facilities containing pass-through, bypass, and storage configurations, including storage-related piping.

The "Working Group" found that:

  • The PHMSA and OSHA regulations provided the same level of protection for "Midstream Processing Facilities".
  • The possibility of enforcing both sets of regulations might make "Midstream Processing Facilities" less safe by causing confusion and creating contradictions.

Therefore, they drafted seven frequently asked questions (FAQs) and answers and submitted them to PHMSA. After review, PHSMA has now put out an announcement draft document for comment that contains the FAQs and additional information, such as the definition for "Midstream Processing Facilities":

The clarifications of and the definition for "Midstream Processing Facilities" in the document are:

"For the purposes of this guidance document, a "midstream processing facility" is a processing facility that receives products being transported by PHMSA-jurisdictional pipelines and reinjects those products for continued transportation by pipeline. In other words, a midstream processing facility is a processing facility with piping or storage that is engaged in the transportation of gas or hazardous liquids by pipeline, and is therefore a pipeline facility subject to PHMSA jurisdiction. The pipeline systems within or associated with midstream processing facilities may be subject to regulation by one or more Federal agencies, depending on the facility's purpose and configuration. PHMSA regulates the safety of transportation related pipeline systems associated with midstream processing facilities in 49 CFR parts 190–199, while OSHA regulates safety within midstream processing facilities using the Process Safety Management (PSM) regulations (29 CFR 1910.119)."

The deadline for comments for the draft was January 4, 2021. As Asset Optimization Consultants, Inc. (AOC) is not an operating company, we do not take sides but try to help our clients comply with all federal, state, and local regulations. We believe this draft clarification from PHMSA will help operating company's make decisions about compliance that will make their facilities safer. If you are not aware of this new development, please go to the link above or see the following source or contact us:


REFERENCES
  1. Pipeline Safety: Midstream Facilities Frequently Asked Questions. (2020, November 4). Retrieved from https://cms7.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations-fr/rulemaking/2020-24011
  2. Olenchuk, Van Ness Feldman LLP, S. A., Karaus, Van Ness Feldman LLP, B. S., Cunningham, Van Ness Feldman LLP, J. I., & Bracamonte, Van Ness Feldman LLP, M. (2020, November 13). Pipeline safety update - Issue No. 161. Retrieved from https://www.vnf.com/pipeline-safety-update-issue-no-161

Be the first to comment

Comments

There are no comments for this article.

Add your comment

Related Services

Mechanical Integrity Assessments

An interdependent assessment of your people, process, and technologies for a confident path forward

Development of Mechanical Integrity (MI) Procedures and Processes

A maintenance system designed in which elements work together as a quality system for maximum returns

RAM, RCM, FMEA, FMECA and Bad Actor Analysis

AOC delivers the policies, procedures, work processes, knowledge and actions such as preventive maintenance, predictive maintenance, and condition monitoring tasks.

Related Training

RBI/MI Overview

A high level overview intrucing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection

GE APM Mechanical Integrity Work Process Training

How do I use GE APM to perform MI/RBI tasks?

Courses Customized to Your Needs

What if my training needs are not listed here?

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) - A Mechanical Integrity Best Practice

What are your goals for RBI? How will you measure your success? How will you sustain that success?

RBI Concepts - Return on Net Assets (RONA)

Asset Integrity Management - how you perform at the plant level affects those goals set at the board room

Related Knowledge

RBI Value: Both Transitioning And From The Start

A look at how RBI adds value whether you are just starting out or transitioning from a traditional methodology.

How to Incorporate the New PHMSA Underground Gas Storage Requirements

This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.

Plant Management 101: Common Work Processes

A dysfunctionality found in many refineries, chemical plants, and other production facilities, is a lack of common asset management work processes.

Asset Value Management vs Asset Performance Management

A look at how the financial sector's concept of Asset Value Management can be applied to the petrochemical industry.

National Regulation 13 in Brazil

When working in Brazil please be aware that Brazil has its own Regulatory Standard – NR13 – that covers the minimum requirements for managing the integrity and inspection of steam boilers, pressure vessels, storage tanks and interconnecting pipes.

Proposed API 581 Inspection Plan Optimization Example

An example to compliment our earlier proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581

Proposed API 581 Inspection Plan Optimization

A proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581

Process Safety Management (PSM) and Commercial Refrigeration

Organizations that have commercial refrigeration facilities need to be aware of new OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) regulations.

Dynamic Risk - Mechanical Integrity

Things are always changing. Including your risk profile.

Safe Operating Limits (SOL) vs Integrity Operating Windows (IOW)

An interesting discussion in which several engineers find common ground.