National Regulation 13 in Brazil

, Be the first to comment

Tags: Inspection Mechanical Integrity Regulation


Although Risk Based Inspection is well recognised as a good practice it has not been adopted by every country in the world. Brazil in particular has its own Regulatory Standard known as NR13 which it uses to set out some minimum time-based safety standards for the management and inspection of steam boilers, pressure vessels, some metal storage tanks and their interconnecting pipes. Hopefully the adoption of Risk Based Inspection is not far away.

National Regulation 13 in Brazil

Unfortunately Brazil is currently in the news for the terrible way that it has been affected by COVID-19 with over 300,000 deaths to date. In 2019 I had the pleasure of visiting the country to train Engineers and Inspectors in how to use some Mechanical Integrity software for managing Inspection Tasks, CML measurements and Inspection Reports. Brazil has its own Regulatory Standards, known as NR, to regulate and provide guidance on mandatory procedures related to Occupational Safety and Health.

National Regulation 13, in particular, was created to set out some minimum safety standards for Steam Boilers and Pressure Vessels. The current regulation sets out the minimum requirements for managing the structural integrity and inspection of steam boilers, some types of pressure vessels, some types of metal storage tanks, and their interconnecting pipes. It also covers aspects of the installation, operation, and maintenance of these kinds of assets as well as the health and safety of workers involved in their operation.

It was important that our training improved the clients Mechanical Integrity procedures as well as ensuring that the client company continued to comply with NR13.

This Regulation covers Steam Boilers and Alkali Boilers. Alkali Boilers are an important part of the Recovery Process in the Paper industry. Steam Boilers are divided into two categories A or B depending on their operating pressure and volume. Steam Boilers in categories A or B should be inspected internally and externally at a maximum interval of 12 months. The inspection intervals for category A boilers can be increased to a maximum of 24 months as long as the safety valves are tested every 12 months. Alkali boilers need to be inspected internally and externally at a maximum interval of 15 months.

The inspection interval prescribed for the Pressure Vessels covered by the Regulation depends on several factors. The first factor is the Fluid Class that the Pressure Vessel contains. This depends on whether the fluid is toxic, flammable, combustible or an asphyxiant for instance. The second factor depends on the Risk Potential. The Risk Potential is the product of the maximum operating pressure and the volume of the pressure vessel. The combination of Fluid Class and Risk Potential categorizes Pressure Vessels into 5 different categories from I to V. Pressure Vessels in Category I need to be inspected externally at a maximum interval of 1 year and internally at a maximum interval of 3 years. Pressure Vessels in Category V, by contrast, need to be inspected externally at a maximum interval of 5 years and internally at a maximum interval of 10 years.

The Regulation was updated in December 2018. In the new Regulation some metal storage tanks now need to be inspected as well. Metal tanks that are buried or grounded with an external diameter of greater than 3 metres and a nominal capacity of greater than 20,000 litres containing toxic, flammable or combustible fluids are covered by the update. Inspection intervals for these tanks should not exceed the intervals recommended in Brazilian Std ABNT NBR 17505-2 - Storage of Flammable and Combustible Liquids Part 2: Tanks and Recipient Storage.

Safety Devices which protect the Boilers, Pressure Vessels and Tanks need to be dismantled, inspected and calibrated at a frequency which is no greater than the internal inspection period prescribed for the equipment that they protect. Similarly, the inspection frequency of Pipes should not be more than the maximum internal inspection period of the most critical Boiler or Vessel that they are connected to.

All of these inspection intervals can be increased if the company has its own Equipment Inspection Services which are certified and audited by the National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology. Companies which have their own Inspection Service are referred to as establishments which have SPIE. In our case the client company had decided it could not justify the time and effort to become a SPIE organization.

As it can be seen, the current regulation, NR13 is completely reliant on time-based settings. Whilst this is an adequate Inspection approach and strategy it is not a cost-effective approach or a strategy that encourages the organization or country to improve. My conversations with the Engineers and Inspectors who are working for the client company lead me to believe that there is ground swell of opinion in the Camacari region of Brazil that the country is ready for a further update of the Regulation. Hopefully the next update will start to include elements of Risk Based Inspection in the very near future giving clients more flexibility to decide their own Inspection strategy.


Be the first to comment

Comments

There are no comments for this article.

Add your comment

Related Services

Inspection Services

Asset Optimization's Inspection Group provides our partners with comprehensive inspection resources to further support our internal needs and the needs of our partners. Consisting of both API-certified inspectors and ASNT-compliant technicians, our inspection team offers a variety of visual inspection and NDE services.

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Implementation and Planning

AOC has delivered thousands of sustainable Risk Based Inspection (RBI) programs earning the trust of owner operators.

Related Training

API 580 RBI Overview

What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?

API 580 Training

Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?

API 581 Overview

What's actually going on inside all of that fancy software? An introduction to the API 581 methodology.

API 581 Training

A deep dive into quantitative Risk Based Inspection (RBI) as outlined in API 581.

Related Knowledge

How to Incorporate the New PHMSA Underground Gas Storage Requirements

This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.

Plant Management 101: Common Work Processes

A dysfunctionality found in many refineries, chemical plants, and other production facilities, is a lack of common asset management work processes.

Asset Value Management vs Asset Performance Management

A look at how the financial sector's concept of Asset Value Management can be applied to the petrochemical industry.

Proposed API 581 Inspection Plan Optimization Example

An example to compliment our earlier proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581

Proposed API 581 Inspection Plan Optimization

A proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581

RBI Value: Both Transitioning And From The Start

A look at how RBI adds value whether you are just starting out or transitioning from a traditional methodology.

PHMSA vs OSHA Jurisdiction

PHMSA has out for comment, draft document information, that clarifies its jurisdiction in relation to OSHA for Midstream Processing Facilities.

Other Benefits of Risk Based Inspection Implementation

A look at several of the secondary benefits of Risk Based Inspection

Insights on Improving Inspection Effectiveness

Since the evaluation of inspection effectiveness for RBI can be so subjective, following these suggestions can greatly improve the process.

Qualitative Risk Assessment of a Commercial Refrigeration System

A case study presenting the methods used to calculate qualitative risk for a critical refrigeration system and the results of the assessment.