Tags: Damage Mechanisms Data Collection Risk Based Inspection
Gathering adequate process data to determine HTHA susceptibility is sometimes a difficult and time consuming task. Therefore a simple screening can be performed to determine if more detailed process data is required. Senior Corrosion Specialist, Vibha Zaman, discusses the screening process and what factors to consider when more data is required.
The U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) issued a safety alert on Preventing High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) in August, 2016 in relation to a catastrophic failure that occurred in a 40 year old heat exchanger due to HTHA. The CSB warned that predicting and identifying equipment damage due to HTHA is complex, and made the following recommendations:
This article focuses on item (2) above and discusses gathering and verifying process data to determine susceptibility to HTHA.
HTHA occurs from prolonged exposure to hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure when molecular hydrogen dissociates to form atomic hydrogen which reacts with unstable carbides present in steel to form methane. HTHA can result in the following types of damage:
One of the main concerns with HTHA is that it can be very difficult to detect the location and extent of damage due to limitations with NDE methods, particularly during the initial stages.
The API RP 941 Nelson Curves, which plot the operating temperature vs hydrogen partial pressure for several different materials, are typically used to determine whether an asset is susceptible to HTHA. The curves are based on a combination of empirical data and industry experience accumulated since the 1940's and indicate whether the operating conditions fall into a safe or unsafe region for HTHA damage to occur. Since temperature and hydrogen partial pressure data were not always precisely known and due to the uncertainty of actual operating conditions experienced over many decades of operation for data points on the Nelson curves, API RP 941 recommends operating companies add a safety margin when using the curves.
Gathering adequate process data to determine HTHA susceptibility is sometimes a difficult and time consuming task. Therefore a simple screening can be performed to determine if more detailed process data is required. If all of the below criteria are met, a more detailed review of the process data is required to determine the HTHA susceptibility and potential for damage (e.g. high, medium, low):
|Material||Operating Conditions for HTHA Service (Note 1)|
|CS||Above the relevant CS Nelson curve or within 50°F / 50 psia below the curve|
|C-0.5Mo||Above the CS Nelson curve|
|1.0 Cr||Above the 1.0 Cr Nelson curve or within 50°F below the curve|
|1.25 Cr – actual Cr content unknown||Above the 1Cr Nelson curve|
|1.25 Cr – actual Cr content known and > 1.2% (Note 2)||Above the 1.25% Cr Nelson curve or within 50°F below the curve|
|All other steels||Above the appropriate Nelson curve or within 50°F below the curve|
|Note 1: operating temperatures for screening include normal, offset, upset, startup, shutdown, etc.|
Note 2: chemical composition information may be available in material test reports
If the operating conditions fall within the above screening criteria, further evaluation of the data is required including the length of time the equipment was operating in the HTHA susceptibility region and the severity of the operating conditions.
Since temperature is a key variable in determining HTHA susceptibility, information on temperature should be collected with knowledge on where the data comes from in order to ascertain the accuracy of the values reported. For example, information taken from direct measurements using thermocouples is likely to be more accurate than that taken using an IR gun, process simulations, or extrapolated based on measurements taken at other locations. If process simulations were used, it is important to confirm that the degree of fouling was accurately modeled. Failure to do so can provide inaccurate temperature data which can lead to a false assessment of the HTHA potential. Below are some additional guidelines on providing temperature data:
Gathering information on the amount of hydrogen present at any given location within a process unit is often a complex task and typically needs to be performed taking into consideration a combination of factors including the location of hydrogen probes, extent of reaction, material balance or process simulations, along with information on whether the hydrogen is in vapor phase or dissolved in liquid. Since the amount of hydrogen present can vary along the run length, it is recommended to use sustained high values for the first pass.
Determining the H2PP for components having a vapor phase is a much more straightforward process than for equipment where only a liquid phase exists. For equipment having a vapor phase, the below formulas can be used to calculate the H2PP once the amount of hydrogen present is determined:H2PP=(moles hydrogen / total moles in stream) * total pressure (psia)
The H2PP for liquid filled systems where no vapor phase exists can be estimated by following the guidelines provided in Appendix G of the latest edition of API RP 941. Appendix G provides five different methods for determining the H2PP. Detailed discussion of these methods is outside the scope of this blog, however Appendix G essentially recommends using the H2PP of the vapor that was last in equilibrium with the liquid or using the calculated H2PP that would be in equilibrium with the liquid at its operating temperature and pressure.
HTHA is a time dependent mechanism that occurs from prolonged exposure to hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure. Due to the variability in operating conditions that can occur over the lifetime of an asset, along with the difficulty in obtaining H2PP data, collecting process data for determining HTHA susceptibility is often a complicated task. A screening process can be used to determine whether a more detailed data collection effort is required. This blog provides guidelines for performing a screening to determine if process conditions place an equipment at risk for HTHA. It also provides guidelines on how to gather more accurate temperature and H2PP to determine the potential for HTHA.
Stay tuned for the next entry in this eight-part series covering guidelines on assigning process conditions for RBI efforts:
Comments are closed for this article.
AOC has delivered thousands of sustainable Risk Based Inspection (RBI) programs earning the trust of owner operators.
One of the most important steps in an RBI project is the corrosion study or damage mechanism review.
Achieving zero corrosion-related loss of primary containment in the refining industry.
How well do you know RBI? Take this short quiz to test your knowledge of the API 580 risk-based inspection (RBI) work process.
Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.
A high level overview intrucing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection
What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?
Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?
What's actually going on inside all of that fancy software? An introduction to the API 581 methodology.
A deep dive into quantitative Risk Based Inspection (RBI) as outlined in API 581.
Additional process data may be needed when environment, stress, and metallurgy are so alligned so as to indicate susceptibility to environmental cracking.
This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.
A look at several of the secondary benefits of Risk Based Inspection
Since the evaluation of inspection effectiveness for RBI can be so subjective, following these suggestions can greatly improve the process.
How RBI, DMR, and IOW programs can be used to manage reliability of Ethane crackers.
This article suggests additional factors to consider when calculating probablity of failure for equipment exposed to high temperatures.
This article identifies several factors to consider during data collection as well as points out some guidelines for selecting potential inspection locations.
What are the hidden benefits of implementing Risk Based Inspection?
A dysfunctionality found in many refineries, chemical plants, and other production facilities, is a lack of common asset management work processes.
A look at how the financial sector's concept of Asset Value Management can be applied to the petrochemical industry.
There are no comments for this article.