Tags: API 580 API 581 Damage Mechanisms Inspection Mechanical Integrity Risk Risk Based Inspection
While Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) promised to reduce intrusive vessel entries, corporate risk aversion and rigid API standards have hindered progress. This post examines why internal visual inspection (IVI) remains the standard despite its human-factor limitations. We analyze the Probability of Detection (POD) for advanced NII technologies - including PAUT, PEC, and Corrosion Mapping - to propose a roadmap for achieving technical and regulatory equivalency in refinery asset integrity.

The original promise of Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) was that better risk understanding (probability X consequence) would allow operators to reduce intrusive inspections, especially vessel entries, exchanger pull-and-clean, and widespread stripping, by substituting credible non-intrusive inspections (NII) and smarter targeting. In practice, that promise has largely not been fulfilled. Here are my reasons for this not happening:
To fulfill the promise, I believe RBI would need to be paired with:
In modern refineries, internal visual inspection (IVI) has long been the standard for evaluating the integrity of pressure vessels, piping, heat exchangers, and tanks. While visual inspection is straightforward and well understood, it comes with limitations:
With advances in Non-Intrusive Inspection (NII) technologies, many refineries are now supplementing or even replacing IVI to increase Probability of Detection (POD) while reducing risk and downtime.
Non-Intrusive Inspection methods are capable of detecting:
Moreover, these methods often provide quantitative measurements, enabling better trend analysis and risk-based maintenance decisions.
While consensus is still evolving, it isn't only about documents; it's also about shared understanding and competence across practitioners. Roadblocks still exist:
Therefore, in recognition of the fact that most company MI programs are not maintained by inspection experts, I want to start a conversation on what NII techniques are/could be equivalent to internal visual inspection. Below is a table that I have assembled to serve as a starting point. What are your thougnts? Comment below or contact us directly. I am excited to hear your thoughts.
| Inspection Method | Representative POD / Notes | Source | Practical Application / Equipment Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional UT (contact UT) | 50% POD at ~5 mm flaw depth, 90% POD at ~10-12 mm, up to ~99% for larger defects | USNRC (1) | Wall thickness monitoring for vessels, piping, tanks; general corrosion detection |
| Phased Array UT (PAUT) | 50% POD at ~5 mm flaw, 90% POD ~10-12 mm, improves detection of complex geometries and weld defects | USNRC (1) | Weld inspection on vessels, piping, heat exchangers, and cracking detection |
| TOFD (Time-of-Flight Diffraction) | Very high POD for planar cracks; 95-98% for cracks > 3 mm | Eddyfi Technologies(2) | Critical welds, nozzle attachments, pressure relief devices; HIC/SOHIC detection |
| Radiographic Testing (RT/Digital RT) | High resolution; detects internal anomalies invisible to visual inspection; POD depends on exposure, film quality, object thickness | Asset Optimization Consults observation | Shell-side corrosion, tubesheets, localized pitting in exchangers or vessels |
| Eddy Current / RFT / IRIS (tubes) | POD 80-98% depending on flaw type (pitting, cracks) | USNRC (1) | Tube inspection in shell-and-tube heat exchangers, reboilers, and condensers; pitting and cracking detection |
| Automated UT / Corrosion Mapping | High-density thickness mapping; POD 90-95% for general wall loss; 80-90% for isolated pitting | Asset Optimization Consults observation | Vessel and piping wall thickness; screening for general corrosion and localized thinning; tanks, columns, drums |
| Pulsed Eddy Current (PEC) | Detects corrosion under insulation; POD 60-90% for wall loss > 15-20% | WCNDT(3) | Insulated piping, tanks, vessels; CUI screening without insulation removal |
| Guided Wave UT (GWUT) | POD 50-90% for long-range screening; good for inaccessible areas | BINDT(4) | Long pipelines, buried or hard-to-access piping; screening for general wall loss |
| Remote Visual Inspection (RVI, borescopes) | High-resolution internal imaging; POD 85-95% for general corrosion; 60-80% for small pits | Asset Optimization Consults observation | Internal surfaces of vessels, columns, heat exchangers; restricted entry areas; fouling inspection |
| EMAT (Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer) | 90-95% for surface-breaking cracks; 80-90% for wall-loss; good for coated surfaces | Eddyfi Technologies(2) | Surface-breaking crack detection in coated vessels, tanks, and piping; welds and nozzle connections |
When evaluation of inspection results suggest that an asset is near its end of useful life, Fitness for Service evaluations can determine if the asset us suitable for continued operation.
AOC has delivered thousands of sustainable Risk Based Inspection (RBI) programs earning the trust of owner operators.
One of the most important steps in an RBI project is the corrosion study or damage mechanism review.
Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.
How well do you know RBI? Take this short quiz to test your knowledge of the API 580 risk-based inspection (RBI) work process.
Is your plant's MI program compliant? Use our checklist to assess your current program against industry standards and receive expert recommendations for improvement.
A high level overview introducing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection
What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?
Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?
What's actually going on inside all of that fancy software? An introduction to the API 581 methodology.
A deep dive into quantitative Risk Based Inspection (RBI) as outlined in API 581.
What are equipment/inspection strategies in relation to mechanical integrity (MI) and risk based inspection (RBI)?
This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.
Discover why equipment failure is the root cause of most catastrophic incidents. Mechanical Integrity (MI) is the non-negotiable foundation that prevents loss of containment and protects your entire PSM system. Learn the 8 reasons MI is essential.
An update to our original proposal for an API 581 Inspection Plan optimization.
Risk Based inspection is not always cut and dry when it comes to choosing a methodology. Knowing which one to choose is an important step in the overall process.
Budget tight? Some Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) risks are too critical to delay. Learn the top 3 RBI risks that can't wait for a budget rebound.
An example to compliment our earlier proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581
A proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581
How AOC's new AI solution cuts data collection time for Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) projects by automatically extracting and normalizing data from historical engineering documents, achieving very high accuracy and reducing costs.
What are the requirements of API 580, 4th edition?
Comments
There are no comments for this article.