Mechanical Integrity (MI) Compliance Checklist
Assess your plant's Mechanical Integrity (MI) program for compliance with key safety regulations like OSHA 1910.119. This interactive checklist provides a clear snapshot of your program's strengths and identifies areas for improvement, helping you maintain a safe and compliant facility.
Evaluate Your Mechanical Integrity Program
Maintaining a robust Mechanical Integrity (MI) program is critical for ensuring the safety and operational reliability of your plant. A well-managed program helps prevent catastrophic failures, protects personnel, and ensures compliance with stringent regulations, including OSHA's Process Safety Management (PSM) standard (1910.119).
This comprehensive checklist, developed from AOC's extensive experience with formal MI audits, allows you to objectively evaluate your current program. It is designed for plant managers, engineers, and maintenance personnel who are responsible for maintaining a compliant and effective MI system.
How to Use This Tool
- Review and Assess: Go through the list of essential MI program elements. These questions are based on industry best practices and our proven audit methodology.
- Check All That Apply: Select each element that is currently a part of your program. Be thorough and honest in your assessment.
- Add Comments: Use the provided comment field to offer justifications, explain why an element may not be present, or note any mitigating controls. This helps in building a more complete picture of your program's status.
- Receive Your Report: Upon submission, you will receive a detailed email report. This personalized analysis will summarize your results and provide targeted recommendations to address any gaps and improve your program's compliance and effectiveness.
This tool is a first step toward identifying areas for strategic improvement, helping you proactively enhance safety and reduce risk within your operations.
Related Services
Key parameters and mitigating actions for variables that may dramatically affect the intended design life of your asset
A maintenance system designed in which elements work together as a quality system for maximum returns
AOC delivers the policies, procedures, work processes, knowledge and actions such as preventive maintenance, predictive maintenance, and condition monitoring tasks.
Related Tools
Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.
Related Training
A high level overview introducing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection
What are your goals for RBI? How will you measure your success? How will you sustain that success?
How important are they?
What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?
Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?
Related Knowledge
A formal acceptable risk policy standardizes risk tolerance, assigns decision authority by risk level, and requires escalating approvals for higher risk, improving consistency, transparency, and resource prioritization while preventing unmanaged risk exposure.
Unified framework integrating MI, RCM, PHA, and SIL/SIS into one risk-based system using a common matrix, shared failure modes, and closed-loop feedback to align actions, prioritize resources, and ensure consistent, real-world risk reduction.
MOC fails not from lack of knowledge, but from conflict with operational pressures. Speed is rewarded over rigor, definitions are unclear, ownership is weak, and risk reviews become procedural, allowing changes, cumulative risk, and hazards to go unmanaged.
Practical guide for implementing a Mechanical Integrity and RBI program for U.S. oil and gas wellfield, gathering, and midstream facilities. Aligns lifecycle asset management, inspection, and risk control with API standards, PHMSA pipeline rules, and OSHA PSM requirements.
Organizations that follow the spirit of risk-based inspection rather than its minimum requirements use a definable, structured, auditable process to confirm that an alternate inspection technique provides equal or better risk reduction than a baseline method.
The U.S. refining industry recorded nine significant fires and explosions in 2025. While the count is low, incidents at Chevron and HF Sinclair highlight the critical need for robust mechanical integrity and process safety programs.
Why companies overlook Mechanical Integrity: It's expensive, exposes risk, requires specialized knowledge, and is difficult to audit. Learn the 10 structural, cultural, and economic reasons MI is the weakest PSM element.
Discover why equipment failure is the root cause of most catastrophic incidents. Mechanical Integrity (MI) is the non-negotiable foundation that prevents loss of containment and protects your entire PSM system. Learn the 8 reasons MI is essential.
Refinery incidents, especially fires & explosions, appear to be increasing since 2018, though industry-reported safety metrics show a drop. We look at the data, the debate, and why the numbers conflict.
PHMSA vs. OSHA: Understanding the Overlap Hydrocarbon facilities like pipelines, refineries, and terminals often fall under both PHMSA (DOT) and OSHA (DOL). Learn where each agency's jurisdiction begins and ends, and how to coordinate your integrity programs for compliance.
Asset Optimization is the authority on asset integrity solutions that align your people, process, and technology with unmatched returns across your enterprise.
About AOC
Consulting Activities
Contact Us
United States
16000 Barkers Point LaneSuite 105
Houston, TX 77079
Phone: +1 (281) 909-7333
Email: info@aoccorp.com
Europe
CATCH Facility,Redwood Park Estate,
Stallingborough,
Grimsby, North East Lincolnshire,
DN41 8TH, United Kingdom
Phone: 00 44 (0) 1469 552875
Copyright © 2024 Asset Optimization Consultants, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Enter values here