Mechanical Integrity (MI) Compliance Checklist

Version 1.0

Assess your plant's Mechanical Integrity (MI) program for compliance with key safety regulations like OSHA 1910.119. This interactive checklist provides a clear snapshot of your program's strengths and identifies areas for improvement, helping you maintain a safe and compliant facility.

MI Compliance Checklist

Evaluate Your Mechanical Integrity Program

Maintaining a robust Mechanical Integrity (MI) program is critical for ensuring the safety and operational reliability of your plant. A well-managed program helps prevent catastrophic failures, protects personnel, and ensures compliance with stringent regulations, including OSHA's Process Safety Management (PSM) standard (1910.119).

This comprehensive checklist, developed from AOC's extensive experience with formal MI audits, allows you to objectively evaluate your current program. It is designed for plant managers, engineers, and maintenance personnel who are responsible for maintaining a compliant and effective MI system.

How to Use This Tool

  • Review and Assess: Go through the list of essential MI program elements. These questions are based on industry best practices and our proven audit methodology.
  • Check All That Apply: Select each element that is currently a part of your program. Be thorough and honest in your assessment.
  • Add Comments: Use the provided comment field to offer justifications, explain why an element may not be present, or note any mitigating controls. This helps in building a more complete picture of your program's status.
  • Receive Your Report: Upon submission, you will receive a detailed email report. This personalized analysis will summarize your results and provide targeted recommendations to address any gaps and improve your program's compliance and effectiveness.

This tool is a first step toward identifying areas for strategic improvement, helping you proactively enhance safety and reduce risk within your operations.

Enter values here

*
*
*
*

1: A program has been developed that offers guidance, procedures, and instructions for implementation of the Mechanical Integrity System.
Comment if unchecked.
2: A formal audit of compliance of the MI system with regulations is conducted periodically.
Comment if unchecked.
3: Written procedures exist to maintain the ongoing integrity of covered process equipment. The following equipment types are included in these procedures
  • Pressure Vessels
  • Storage Tanks
  • Piping Systems and Circuits
  • Relief Devices
Comment if unchecked.
4: Up-to-date P&IDs are available for each process unit.
Comment if unchecked.
5: A system is in place that advises supervisors when inspection or corrective actions are scheduled.
Comment if unchecked.
6: Deficiencies are documented and tracked until corrected.
Comment if unchecked.
7: An established process is in place which defines the requirements for extending inspections and deficiency corrections beyond their established due dates.
Comment if unchecked.
8: Each employee involved in maintaining the ongoing integrity of covered equipment has been trained in the procedures applicable to the employee’s job tasks.
Comment if unchecked.
9: A system is in place to verify that new or replacement equipment as it is fabricated is suitable for the intended process application.
Comment if unchecked.
10: The recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices that are applicable for the pressure vessels and storage tanks have been identified.
Comment if unchecked.
11: Each inspection and test performed on covered pressure vessels, storage tanks, piping circuits, and relief/vent devices are documented with the following information:
  • Identification of the equipment being inspected
  • Date of the task
  • Name of the person who performed the task
  • Description of the task and extent of the inspection/test
  • Results of the task
Comment if unchecked.
12: Pressure vessels, storage tanks, piping circuits, and relief/vent devices are inspected by Assigned Persons who are qualified by documented training and certification.
Comment if unchecked.
13: Inspections and/or measurements which do not meet acceptable limits are deficiencies and are corrected before further operation, or in a safe and timely manner when interim means are taken to assure safe operation.
Comment if unchecked.
14: The Management of Change procedure applies to changes in the design data and the process operating limits for each equipment/component. PSM requires those maintaining the MI system be notified of of those changes so that damage mechanisms can be reevaluated and inspection plans can be reviewed.
Comment if unchecked.

Related Services

Integrity Operating Window Development

Key parameters and mitigating actions for variables that may dramatically affect the intended design life of your asset

Development of Mechanical Integrity (MI) Procedures and Processes

A maintenance system designed in which elements work together as a quality system for maximum returns

RAM, RCM, FMEA, FMECA and Bad Actor Analysis

AOC delivers the policies, procedures, work processes, knowledge and actions such as preventive maintenance, predictive maintenance, and condition monitoring tasks.

Related Tools

RBI Potential Savings Calculator

Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.

Related Training

RBI/MI Overview

A high level overview introducing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) - A Mechanical Integrity Best Practice

What are your goals for RBI? How will you measure your success? How will you sustain that success?

API 580 RBI Overview

What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?

API 580 Training

Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?

Related Knowledge

How to Incorporate the New PHMSA Underground Gas Storage Requirements

This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.

Risk Strategies for Pressure Retaining Equipment

What are equipment/inspection strategies in relation to mechanical integrity (MI) and risk based inspection (RBI)?

National Regulation 13 in Brazil

When working in Brazil please be aware that Brazil has its own Regulatory Standard – NR13 – that covers the minimum requirements for managing the integrity and inspection of steam boilers, pressure vessels, storage tanks and interconnecting pipes.

PHMSA vs OSHA Jurisdiction

PHMSA has out for comment, draft document information, that clarifies its jurisdiction in relation to OSHA for Midstream Processing Facilities.

The Top Three RBI Risks That Cannot Wait for a Budget Rebound

Budget tight? Some Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) risks are too critical to delay. Learn the top 3 RBI risks that can't wait for a budget rebound.

Why We're Lowering Our Rates - and Why Now?

Rate reduction on new projects to support the industry during the current extended downturn.

Plant Management 101: Common Work Processes

A dysfunctionality found in many refineries, chemical plants, and other production facilities, is a lack of common asset management work processes.

Asset Value Management vs Asset Performance Management

A look at how the financial sector's concept of Asset Value Management can be applied to the petrochemical industry.

Proposed API 581 Inspection Plan Optimization Example

An example to compliment our earlier proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581

Proposed API 581 Inspection Plan Optimization

A proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581