Tags: Mechanical Integrity Process Safety Management Regulation
Hydrocarbon facilities in the U.S. frequently face overlapping regulation from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). While PHMSA primarily governs transportation safety via pipelines (49 CFR 190-199), OSHA focuses on worker safety and health within facilities, including Process Safety Management (PSM). This post clarifies their distinct scopes, common jurisdictional boundaries (e.g., at the first valve inside a facility), and provides tips for operators to integrate their compliance programs.

Hydrocarbon facilities in the U.S. - such as refineries, gas plants, terminals, and pipelines - often fall under both PHMSA and OSHA jurisdiction, but for different reasons. Their scopes overlap in some areas (especially process safety), yet each agency enforces distinct regulations. Let's take a deeper dive into the PHMSA and OSHA in-service integrity regulations.
Both organizations are focused on integrity, but the principal question for companies in these sectors to ponder is whether these facilities fall under the OSHA Process Safety Management regulation. The table below presents each organization's primary responsibilities:
| Agency | Full Name | Core Focus |
|---|---|---|
| PHMSA | Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, DOT) | Transportation and storage of hazardous materials and energy products via pipelines and containers |
| OSHA | Occupational Safety and Health Administration (part of the U.S. Department of Labor) | Worker safety and health inside workplaces and facilities |
A PHMSA draft notification document was issued in 2020 to help clear up where PHMSA jurisdiction ends and OSHA begins. After researching this document and reviewing other announcements/articles, the table below summarizes AOC's understanding
| Area | PHMSA | OSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Pipelines (transmission, gathering, distribution) | ✅ Yes - primary authority under 49 CFR Parts 190–199 | ❌ No - (PHMSA preempts OSHA for most pipeline operations) |
| Pipeline terminals and compressor stations | ✅ Yes - Applies up to certain facility boundaries | ✅ Yes - May also apply inside buildings or where employees work |
| Refineries, gas processing plants, chemical plants | ❌ No - Typically not covered by PHMSA (except pipeline connections) | ✅ Yes - Fully covered under 29 CFR 1910, including PSM (Process Safety Management) |
| Storage (tanks, spheres, caverns) | ✅ Yes - If integrated with pipeline systems | ✅ Yes - If within facility boundaries or employee work areas |
| Transportation (trucks, railcars) | ✅ Yes - For the hazardous materials transport itself | ✅ Yes - For worker safety during loading/unloading |
The regulations below are where the confusion lies.
| Regulation | Agency | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 49 CFR Parts 190–199 (1) | PHMSA | Reporting, integrity management, and enforcement |
| 29 CFR 1910.119 (2) | OSHA | Process Safety Management (PSM) of Highly Hazardous Chemicals |
PHMSA jurisdiction typically ends at the first valve inside a refinery, tank farm, or process facility; beyond that, OSHA takes over. To clear this up, the announcement defined Midstream Facilities as:
"A processing facility that receives products being transported by PHMSA-jurisdictional pipelines and reinjects those products for continued transportation by pipeline. In other words, a midstream processing facility is a processing facility with piping or storage that is engaged in the transportation of gas or hazardous liquids by pipeline, and is therefore a pipeline facility subject to PHMSA jurisdiction. The pipeline systems within or associated with midstream processing facilities may be subject to regulation by one or more Federal agencies, depending on the facility's purpose and configuration. PHMSA regulates the safety of transportation-related pipeline systems associated with midstream processing facilities in 49 CFR parts 190–199, while OSHA regulates safety within midstream processing facilities using the Process Safety Management (PSM) regulations (29 CFR 1910.119)." (3)
Below are some specific examples to help your understanding of the boundaries of the regulations.
| Scenario | PHMSA Applies? | OSHA Applies? |
|---|---|---|
| Crude oil transmission pipeline between fields | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Compressor station building | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Refinery distillation unit | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Midstream Processing Facility | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| LNG terminal (marine offloading) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Truck rack loading at a terminal | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
To stay compliant and efficient:
If your organization needs help aligning your MI programs to comply with both organizations, please contact us or reach out to me directly.
Key parameters and mitigating actions for variables that may dramatically affect the intended design life of your asset
A maintenance system designed in which elements work together as a quality system for maximum returns
AOC delivers the policies, procedures, work processes, knowledge and actions such as preventive maintenance, predictive maintenance, and condition monitoring tasks.
Is your plant's MI program compliant? Use our checklist to assess your current program against industry standards and receive expert recommendations for improvement.
Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.
A high level overview introducing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection
What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?
Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?
What's actually going on inside all of that fancy software? An introduction to the API 581 methodology.
A deep dive into quantitative Risk Based Inspection (RBI) as outlined in API 581.
This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.
PHMSA has out for comment, draft document information, that clarifies its jurisdiction in relation to OSHA for Midstream Processing Facilities.
An update to our original proposal for an API 581 Inspection Plan optimization.
Budget tight? Some Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) risks are too critical to delay. Learn the top 3 RBI risks that can't wait for a budget rebound.
What are equipment/inspection strategies in relation to mechanical integrity (MI) and risk based inspection (RBI)?
When working in Brazil please be aware that Brazil has its own Regulatory Standard – NR13 – that covers the minimum requirements for managing the integrity and inspection of steam boilers, pressure vessels, storage tanks and interconnecting pipes.
A dysfunctionality found in many refineries, chemical plants, and other production facilities, is a lack of common asset management work processes.
An example to compliment our earlier proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581
A proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581
A look at how RBI adds value whether you are just starting out or transitioning from a traditional methodology.
Comments
There are no comments for this article.