Tags: Mechanical Integrity Regulation Risk Management
Public data suggests U.S. refinery fires and explosions have increased significantly since 2018, with some analyses showing a tripling of incidents. However, industry process safety metrics indicate improvement. This article explores the evidence, why the datasets conflict, and the start of the upward trend.

Multiple independent datasets indicate that U.S. refinery incidents, especially fires and explosions, have increased in recent years. However, industry-reported process safety metrics complicate the picture. This article summarizes the evidence, stakeholder perspectives, and when the upward trend appears to have begun.
Public incident compilations show an increase in major refinery events. An analysis by Arnold & Itkin LLP (n.d.) reported that refinery explosions tripled from 2018 to 2022 compared to earlier years(1). Data from SpillTracker.org recorded 96 petrochemical incidents in 2023 and 132 in 2024, indicating a meaningful rise.(2)
In contrast, the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) reports that Tier 1 process safety event rates have dropped by ~50% over the past decade(3). AFPM's Sustainability Report further notes that refineries remain among the safer industrial manufacturing sectors. Table 1, below, shows the API 754/AFPM definitions for Tier 1 and Tier 2 safety events:
| CONSEQUENCE | TIER 1 | TIER 2 |
|---|---|---|
| An unplanned or uncontrolled release that results in: | ||
| Injury - Employee or Contractor | Fatality / Days Away | OSHA Recordable |
| 3rd Party Hospitalization | Any | --- |
| Officially Declared Community Evacuation or Shelter in Place | Any | --- |
| Fire or Explosion | Damage > $100,000 | Damage > $ 2,500 |
PRD Discharge or Upset Emission with
| Discharge or Emission > Tier 1 TQ on Table 1 | Discharge or Emission > Tier 2 TQ on Table 1 |
| An unignited release of material in any one-hour period | LOPC > Tier 1 TQ on Table 1 | LOPC > Tier 2 TQ on Table 1 |
Table 1. API 754/AFPM definitions for Tier 1 and Tier 2 safety events (4)

Figure 1. API Recommended Practice 754 (4)
In last week's blog, Why We Still See Refinery Fires - More Than 30 Years After OSHA 1910.119, I researched all of the Tier 1 and 2 safety incidents from 1994 through 2025. The claim from AFPM, that "Tier 1 process safety event rates have dropped by ~50% over the past decade", is only valid through the public data to 2022(7). This public data does show a decrease in incident rate from 2011 to 2022. However, let's examine AOC's graph below, which presents our research from 2015 through 2025:

Figure 2. Reported Incidents and Injuries Over the Last Decade
As illustrated by the blue trend line, the number of reported incidents decreased from 2015 to 2022, but from 2023 to the present has definitely shown an uptick. Also, the number of reported incidents in 2015 is the same as in 2025.
Public datasets capture fires, explosions, leaks, and releases, whereas AFPM counts only Tier 1 and 2 process safety events. The interesting part of the data we found in the public record, everything could be classified as Tier 1 or 2. The definitional gap between the researched public data and sources AFPM and Arnold & Itkin LLP is the date range for the analysis, and this contributes to the appearance of conflicting interpretations.
Multiple sources point to 2018 as the inflection point. Arnold & Itkin LLP (n.d.)(1) identify 2018 as the start of the tripling trend. The 2018 Husky Superior Refinery explosion(5) is often cited as part of this shift. An investor analysis(6) shows refinery fires and explosions nearly quadrupling from 2019-2024 compared with the previous six years. The graph above shows the beginning of the upward trend to be 2022. Regardless of the year, all three sources agree that the trend is increasing.
The reasons for the increase are probably multiple. Of course, certain journalists report that federal oversight is "disappearing," even as major refinery explosions occur. The present administration appears to believe that the United States Chemical Safety Board (CSB) is redundant, and its function should reside within OSHA or the EPA. I have personally witnessed that for the incidents in the news this year, there seem to be fewer investigations announced. This is by no means the only or even a major contributing factor. I believe the major contributors are:
Public-facing incident data suggests a real increase in fires and explosions beginning around 2018, and AOC's research indicates 2020. The industry-reported process safety metrics that suggest long-term improvement are misleading since the data begins in 2012 and runs through 2022. Taken together, the rise in high-consequence incidents remains a significant concern for worker safety and environmental protection. My prayer for this holiday season is that the industry takes the next step to performance-based safety management, and all of the people who work in those types of facilities go home every night the same way they arrive, vertical.
Key parameters and mitigating actions for variables that may dramatically affect the intended design life of your asset
A maintenance system designed in which elements work together as a quality system for maximum returns
AOC delivers the policies, procedures, work processes, knowledge and actions such as preventive maintenance, predictive maintenance, and condition monitoring tasks.
Is your plant's MI program compliant? Use our checklist to assess your current program against industry standards and receive expert recommendations for improvement.
Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.
A high level overview introducing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection
What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?
Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?
What's actually going on inside all of that fancy software? An introduction to the API 581 methodology.
A deep dive into quantitative Risk Based Inspection (RBI) as outlined in API 581.
This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.
PHMSA vs. OSHA: Understanding the Overlap Hydrocarbon facilities like pipelines, refineries, and terminals often fall under both PHMSA (DOT) and OSHA (DOL). Learn where each agency's jurisdiction begins and ends, and how to coordinate your integrity programs for compliance.
Learn why catastrophic refinery fires persist 30+ years after OSHA's Process Safety Management (PSM) standard. We detail the causes: from compliance-based vs. performance-based safety to aging infrastructure and weak safety culture. Find out what's missing.
An update to our original proposal for an API 581 Inspection Plan optimization.
Budget tight? Some Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) risks are too critical to delay. Learn the top 3 RBI risks that can't wait for a budget rebound.
What are equipment/inspection strategies in relation to mechanical integrity (MI) and risk based inspection (RBI)?
When working in Brazil please be aware that Brazil has its own Regulatory Standard ā NR13 ā that covers the minimum requirements for managing the integrity and inspection of steam boilers, pressure vessels, storage tanks and interconnecting pipes.
A dysfunctionality found in many refineries, chemical plants, and other production facilities, is a lack of common asset management work processes.
An example to compliment our earlier proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581
A proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581
Comments
There are no comments for this article.