Qualitative RBI of a Commercial Refrigeration System

, Be the first to comment

Tags: Consequence Probability Process Safety Management Risk Risk Based Inspection


How the application of qualitative RBI helped a client prioritize equipment damage mitigation in order to effectively scope a refurbishment project and achieve their system reliability goals. This scenario highlights a significant problem for some refrigeration system owner/users who may be maintaining their assets as prescribed but are unaware of the damage mechanisms that could affect the reliability of their assets and safety of their personnel.

Qualitative RBI of a Commercial Refrigeration System

In light of Mike Hurley's recent post on Process Safety Management (PSM) and Commercial Refrigeration, I wanted to share the scope and results of a Qualitative RBI study employed to prioritize inspection and repairs for a commercial refrigeration unit ahead of a refurbishment project.

Background:

The client used a redundant refrigeration system to maintain product storage temperatures within a relatively tight tolerance that was required by the FDA. The system was fourteen (14) years old and had been maintained per the manufacturer's recommendations. Manufacturer's recommended maintenance did not account for the two (2) biggest damage mechanisms affecting the refrigeration unit: the water quality of the system and corrosion under insulation (CUI). Failures were already occurring in the process, and the client needed the highest level of reliability in this system to avoid product spoilage.

RBI Approach:

A qualitative RBI Assessment was recommended to address the needs of the client. The equipment was divided into basic components for a total of ninety-three (93) components. A non-standard risk matrix with three (3) criticality levels was developed based on the needs of the client.

Probability of Failure

Probability of Failure (POF) was determined by using the following:

  • A simple hoop stress equation for each basic component.
    • Component specific structural tmin assumptions were assigned
    • Conservative assumptions were needed as the manufacturer's data was lacking in some areas.
  • Internal thinning rates were calculated based on known values where available. Estimated rates from similar service and/or a Corrosion Specialist were used where no historical data was available.
  • A standard External CUI rate was used for all components susceptible to CUI with no credit given for paint.
  • The Remaining Life (RL) was then calculated and a factor assigned based on its value.
  • Unique damage mechanisms (UDM) were assigned a qualitative POF factor based on a methodology developed with the client.
  • Probability was finally assigned by using the more conservative factor (RL vs. UDM).
Consequence of Failure

Consequence of Failure (COF) was determined with the client for each component. A methodology was drafted to capture different impacts (Safety, Environmental, System Operability and Storage Room Operability). Each component was then ranked from High to Low based on five (5) different criteria for each impact.

Project Results:

Risk was then defined for each asset by merging POF and COF, the results of which had shown:

  • 65% of the equipment reviewed was ranked as low probability and 45% was ranked low criticality.
  • Six (6) fixed equipment assets and seven (7) piping assets required immediate insulation removal for CUI inspection.
  • Five (5) exchangers required immediate replacement due to water side corrosion. The small size of the exchangers meant inspection and repair were not cost effective.
  • Internal inspections were required on water side components to validate estimated rates and install sacrificial anodes.
  • Equipment replacement was required due to unique damage mechanisms.
  • High Consequence piping was recommended to have more rigorous inspections and examinations to prove the findings of this assessment.
What does this mean?

The application of qualitative RBI helped this client prioritize equipment damage mitigation in order to effectively scope a refurbishment project and achieve their system reliability goals. This scenario highlights a significant problem for some refrigeration system owner/users who may be maintaining their assets as prescribed but are unaware of the damage mechanisms that could affect the reliability of their assets and safety of their personnel.

We have found that refrigeration systems are often overlooked as their integrity is typically managed by personnel outside of the compliance-related, asset integrity industry.

  • Depending on the refrigerant being used, integrity management is required by compliance agencies.
  • Depending on the nature of the owner/user's industry, they may not be aware that certain assets require compliance management.

Qualitative RBI is just one of the tools we can use to help owner/users better understand and effectively manage their asset integrity and reliability.

Are the damage mechanisms properly identified and mitigated for your refrigeration assets?

If your answer is not a confident "Yes", read more about how our Risk Based Inspection Services can help develop, implement or improve your Asset Integrity program.


Be the first to comment

Comments

There are no comments for this article.

Add your comment

Related Services

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Implementation and Planning

AOC has delivered thousands of sustainable Risk Based Inspection (RBI) programs earning the trust of owner operators.

Damage Mechanism Review / Corrosion Study

One of the most important steps in an RBI project is the corrosion study or damage mechanism review.

Related Training

RBI/MI Overview

What is Risk Based Inspection?

API 580 RBI Overview

What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?

API 580 Training

Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?

API 581 Overview

What's actually going on inside all of that fancy software? An introduction to the API 581 methodology.

Related Knowledge

Guidelines for Providing Process Conditions for RBI - Part 6: HTHA

A simple screening to determine HTHA susceptibility and factors to consider when more data is required.

Insights on Improving Inspection Effectiveness

Since the evaluation of inspection effectiveness for RBI can be so subjective, following these suggestions can greatly improve the process.

Guidelines for Providing Process Conditions for RBI - Part 5: Low Temp

This article suggests additional factors to consider when providing process conditions for equipment exposed to low temperatures.

Qualitative Risk Assessment of a Commercial Refrigeration System

A case study presenting the methods used to calculate qualitative risk for a critical refrigeration system and the results of the assessment.

Managing Reliability of Ethane Crackers using DMR, RBI, and IOWs

How RBI, DMR, and IOW programs can be used to manage reliability of Ethane crackers.

Guidelines for Providing Process Conditions for RBI - Part 4: High Temp

This article suggests additional factors to consider when calculating probablity of failure for equipment exposed to high temperatures.

Guidelines for Providing Process Conditions for RBI - Part 3: Fluids

This article offers guidance on the selection of a representative fluid for use in your RBI consequence evaluation.

Steam System Risk Mitigation Using Risk Based Inspection

The benefits of utilizing risk-based methodologies for the inspection programs of often overlooked utilities systems

5 Things to Consider When Choosing Your API Training Provider

Not all vendors are created equal. Some up-front research can go a long way toward a high-quality learning experience.

Goal: 100% API 580 Certified

A long-standing vision of AOC, we are well on our way to meeting the goal of having 100% of our RBI staff certified to API 580.